
A process that fundamentally can't be described and
therefore understood, A Beezone study Insight whereby what you might notice in
yourself is undone. A solution in which you become dull,
self-concerned, and problematic about what you
notice. Not a method of practice A method of intentional technique of
practice. Occurs when you are not present as a self,
watching. Generated from abstracted "witness" point of
view. Occurs in natural, functional moments of
self-forgetting when you are living the discipline
in Satsang. Occurs when you stand back, see yourself, and
become disgusted or decide to do something. Seated in Consciousness Seated in the brain-mind Yields instant comprehension of your activity of
avoidance. Yields data, information about yourself, and
insight based on analyzing information. Radical insight into self and the avoidance of
relationship. Self Analysis See the self and the contraction and the "great
space in which contraction occurs." You realize or
feel what is prior to contraction. See the self and feel contraction Become responsible for self contraction. Remain irresponsible for self contraction. Self-observation in the manner I use the term
can not be done strategically, methodically from a
philosophical point of view The only reason why one would observe one's
self, watch one's self, is by reaction to the sense
of dilemma, by reaction to the felt problem. Self-observation is absolutely a key principle
in the affair of understanding, but it is not
self-watching. assume the, point of view of the mind, the
conscious mind, the mental, mental-mind, and
self-watching life. It may not be initiated as a kind of solution or
motivated by the usual anxieties that one has in
the midst of problems, in the midst of this sense
of dilemma. All human beings, unless they are vegetables,
idiots, engage in this strategy consistently,
constantly in every moment of life Self-observation is
something you may do at random and within such a
process you suddenly see something, comprehend
something We may feel that that strategy is justified and
do it professionally as a technique in our daily
life as a kind of meditation It takes place not when you are
strategically presenting yourself as a
witness to watch yourself, but in moments when
you are free of that exercise, in which you are
like a mirror to your own event, and suddenly the
process of your life shows itself to you. You
reflect it. The vital also has a mind, a brain of a kind, in
the solar plexus. And so when we take on the
analytical strategy of watching, self-watching, we
opt for the point of view of the thinking brain in
the skull and watch all of the manifestations that
are expressed unconsciously and subconsciously
through the vital brain in the solar plexus. You no longer are interfering with the process.
It simply shows itself in consciousness and there
is comprehension, instant insight. All of the strategies assumed from that kind of
solid point of view of the mind in itself are
limiting. occurs spontaneously as a random event. They are ways of controlling the vital from the
point of view of the thinking mind. They don't work
then. They're just a kind of solution. It occurs as insight, the undoing of solid
conditions through the sudden appearance of
consciousness, free consciousness, free life. It's possible by resting in the thinking brain
or in that point of view to feel somehow liberated
from vital life, and that's why the tendency toward
the solid position is very strong in some people
because it gives them the sense of being free of
the implications, at any rate, of vital shock and
of the whole threatening play of vitality. watch all of the manifestations that are
expressed unconsciously and subconsciously through
the vital brain in the solar plexus. They are able to step out of it entirely into
this super-analytical position in which they are
basically unaffected, in which they can willfully
stand on top of the vital. we suddenly comprehend something about the
nature of that total play. And when that
comprehension occurs, we are, at least for the
moment, seated in the dimension of consciousness
itself, not in the seat of some function, some
brain, some strategic position. it has a conventional value. It can be of use in
the scheme of sadhana. It's just that
self-observation relates to this process of
understanding. Self-watching is not, self-watching
or just any kind of way of gathering data useful in
conventional terms is useful enough at the
conventional level of sadhana. real self-observation then doesn't occur in the
thinking mind. you will watch yourself all the time. There are
that specific things you may notice about yourself
that are completely useful, that have nothing
whatever to do with your illumined
consciousness. It occurs when the thinking mind is relaxed,
naturally involved in functioning, being a
reflector rather than an aggressor, a presence, a
self. On those occasions we grasp the nature of the
entire play that is our humanity. And that is
self-observation. Observation of some fragment can't, is not
significant enough, is not central enough On such occasions we're not fixed in the
thinking mind or in the vital mind, not in vital
shock or in the strategy of thought, but in that
prior conscious dimension that fundamentally can't
be described. You will tend to identify the process of
understanding in the form of self-observation with
this game of self-watching When we intuitively fall into that prior kind of
consciousness, then we are seated in that...in
another dimension entirely, and from that point of
view the whole play of our humanity, our mentality,
our vitality, the whole affair, is controllable,
knowable, becomes usable, changeable. From that
point of view we can make the whole affair of life,
mental and vital, a sacrificial and creative
process that doesn't bind. Any moment of self-observation can't last
because something else arises. You must be present
in the next moment. So it's only when this whole
affair of self-observation and insight becomes
summary, conclusive, total comprehension of
fundamentally what you are as an activity. It's
only then that it can appear as a real
responsibility in consciousness. But it appears at
random. You don't forever from that moment
understand. You must enquire. the process of understanding, of real insight,
real self-observation, the vital is released, and
also the strategy of the mind, the thinking mind,
is released. But self-observation you can't initiate.
Anything that is initiated that looks like
self-observation is self-watching. Self-observation is not a process of one's
conventional life. Self-observation is a specific
process valued from the point of view of
understanding. Self-observation is not a matter of
responsibility. It is a matter of conventional
responsibility: you must fulfill the conditions and
so forth in Satsang. But you cannot be responsible
for this process of self observation itself. You
can for self-watching. You can decide to do that
and be responsible for doing it self observation must become summary. It must
become fundamental to the whole of your life whole process...is to make it clear a lesson.
self watching is not understanding. But that is
what you are up to. And that in itself must be
understood, that affair of self-watching purpose of study is not to go on and describe in
endless ...detail what self-observation is ...you
must resort to the practical form of your sadhana,
and lessons must appear...eliminate aspects from of
your conventional life, from the picture you have
of this real understanding. self-observation in its real sense is of that
nature. You not only get information about
yourself, you comprehend that area of drama in your
life and are fundamentally free of it on the basis
of that observation, on the basis of that insight.
And these moments of observation, each time they
appear, have a more summary form each time they
appear. You still see yourself, you're still
comprehending yourself. Self Observation, Responsibility, Consciousness
and the Enquiry..this is the first form of real
responsibility. Self Observation has brought you to
the point of Enquiry and responsibility forgetting of the self-definition, release of
it. And that occurs whenever there is real insight,
real enquiry...such a moment consciousness falls
into its natural position and releases ego, mind,
and desire. Observation or insight, which is fundamentally
the same thing, lasts only when it is perfect,
because if it is perfect it includes all other
possible things that may be observed, and so it
goes on and on and on Any moment of self-observation can't last
because something else arises. You must be present
in the next moment. So it's only when this whole
affair of self-observation and insight becomes
summary, conclusive, total comprehension of
fundamentally what you are as an activity. It's
only then that it can appear as a real
responsibility in consciousness. But it appears at
random. You don't forever from that moment
understand. You must enquire. But self-observation you can't initiate.
Anything that is initiated that looks like
self-observation is self-watching. Self-observation is essentially a random and
passive moment in which no self is presented in you
fulfilling a natural condition of life in Satsang.
And the whole affair of this self-observation
ultimately becomes summary and conclusive, it
becomes comprehension. Then you may enquire. self-observation in its real sense is of that
nature. You not only get information about
yourself, you comprehend that area of drama in your
life and are fundamentally free of it on the basis
of that observation, on the basis of that insight.
And these moments of observation, each time they
appear, have a more summary form each time they
appear. You still see yourself, you're still
comprehending yourself. The content is not what is this significant.
it's the comprehension that's significant, in the
sense of release from that particular binding
process. It becomes more and more summary and
ultimately becomes a perfect tacit, total
comprehension of yourself as an activity and after
that moment you may enquire. Then you are obliged
to be responsible, take a responsible position
relative to the conscious process.
Other talks and writings Self
Observation versus Self-Watching No
Remedy - Introduction
but which must be comprehended!
"...an awakening that comes in the summary of
self-observation, not in some moment of seeing some thing
about yourself. When you've seen the totality of it and see
what the totality is, what it is, not what one portion of it
is, when you see that it is self-contraction, when it is
thoroughly understood in all of its opposites as being just
the self-contraction and that is your own action, something
that you are adding to reality in every moment, then bondage
to that script is released and you awaken to that in which
all of this has been arising and which it is happening, that
to which all that is being added. That is Hearing. Hearing
is a summary observation not the witnessing of some
action."
Beyond
the Koan
NO REMEDY - Part Three: The Complications of Sadhana
"I saw that men could easily be turned to self-observation.
And the process of observation could easily be maintained by
proper guidance or "hearing." And that process of observing
gradually saw the emergence of fundamental insight. Men
could understand the radical nature of seeking, the
adventure of Narcissus, the whole complex life of the
avoidance of relationship. And when understanding arose men
could easily apply understanding to moment to moment
experience. Then understanding became the approach to life
rather than all the automatic, confused activities of
seeking, the drama of Narcissus. In that case, understanding
became enquiry in the form of understanding itself:
"Avoiding relationship?" And the abiding in relationship
with the use of enquiry became the fundamental activity of
conscious life moment to moment or in special
periods of enquiry which might be called
"meditation."
The
Knee of Listening - Chapter 19
|
Adi Da Audio Online------ Intro------ About------ News----- Contact------ Home
|