Call to Freedom of Choice in
Religion and in Sexual Practice
An Essay by
Avatar Adi Da Samraj
In scholarly and popular commentaries on religion, it seems that no religion is ever indicated to be among the so-called "great" religions unless it has, by some historical means, acquired sufficient political power (within some large geographical region) to enforce its views on the mass population. Indeed, before there was the modern political trend toward the proliferation of pluralistic democracies, religions grew in size (and "greatness") mainly by political conquest (and not, at large, by argument, evidence, or proof of Truth). However, the time has come when it should no longer be presumed that any religious institution, tradition, or ideal has the right to grow in numbers by means of political conquest, or (otherwise) to presume that it, by virtue of some past conquests (or any history of presumed power), has the right to its views on the general population of any presumed democracy.
Surely, the time has passed when . . . any region (or domain) of pluralistic democracy can be (or ever should be) presumed to be inherently (or, otherwise, necessarily—and "officially") identified with any particular religious institution, tradition, or ideal. Truly, in a democratic society, every human individual must be free to choose his or her own form and manner of religious (or, otherwise, philosophical) commitment and practice. And, because sexual practice is necessarily based on the particular views associated with one's own religious (or, otherwise, philosophical) understanding, every human individual within a democratic society must be free to choose his or her own form and manner of sexual practice and sexual commitment. Particular religious institutions, sects, or communities have the right and the obligation to guide their own adherents relative to what (from the point of view of the particular religious institution, sect, or community) is right practice relative to sexuality and every other aspect of functional, practical, relational, and cultural life. 1 However, a strong objection must be raised whenever any particular religious (or, otherwise, philosophical) institution, sect, or community presumes the ''official'' right to speak for all members of any general (and generally pluralistic) democratic gathering (or even for the pluralistic "all" of mankind), and (thus) presumes the right to universally declare, make, and enforce laws, rules, and principles based on the point of view of some particular institution, sect, or community within the whole.
It is appropriate for anyone to comment upon (and to work to establish) views and principles and practices within his or her own religious sect and tradition. And it is always appropriate for anyone to write about and (in general) to publicly communicate his or her views on any matters at all. But, in a democratic society, it is not appropriate for anyone (or any particular tradition, institution, sect, or community) to universally establish and enforce laws, rules, and principles that are sectarian (or that prohibit universal free choice relative to the basic matters of human functional, practical, relational, and cultural life).
In a society in which human beings cannot be legally owned (or treated as legal property), sexual relationships should themselves be inherently free of all that is implied by the idea of "property". The sanctioning of marriage by the State is, basically, a device for controlling the transmission of property from generation to generation. The traditional "rule" (and legal expectation) of monogamy (or of any other sexual arrangement) is, basically, a means for imposing property laws (and tax laws) upon relationships of sex and love. (And, additionally, politically powerful religious sects have used sexual "rules" and laws as a means for imposing their sectarian control on the behaviors of mass populations.) Thus, in democratic societies, relationships of sex and love should be set free from State-"licensing" (and from arbitrary sectarian controls), and intimately related individuals should be free to make their own contracts of property (or, otherwise, to contractually release their relationships from any or all implications of property).
It is also clear that human beings must be helped and guided toward greater and greater Growth in the ego-transcending process of the (potentially) seven stages of life. 2 Therefore, democratic societies should, as a whole, greatly value and allow the cultural and community activities of all particular religious (and other general cultural) institutions, sects, and groups—for it is only such institutions, sects, and groups (and not the all-inclusive, and necessarily non-sectarian, democratic "State" as a whole) that are the right, true, and really effective means for helping and guiding their particular adherents in the basic exoteric and esoteric matters of functional, practical, relational, and cultural practice.
It is certainly the case that, for most (but not necessarily all) individuals, the true and full requirements (both exoteric and esoteric) of sex and love will themselves (once they are understood and valued) limit sexual activity and sexual relatedness to (generally) only one partner in any significant period of life (or, in many cases, even for a lifetime). Nevertheless, the public rule and law of democratic societies should always be one that both permits and honors free choice relative to all sexual, and emotional-sexual, matters (whether heterosexual or homosexual). And all religious (and non-religious) people should, in every democratic society, always practice public tolerance, respect, and love. Indeed, "civilization" (in its true, free, and democratic sense) depends on such freedom, tolerance, respect, and love—and not on the imposition of arbitrary and sectarian ideals, expectations, rules, and laws. And it is only by truly democratic practices of public freedom, tolerance, and love that every human individual can be set free from the political and religious tyrannies of the past.
N O T E S
1. The functional, practical, and relational disciplines of the Way of Adidam are forms of appropriate human action and responsibility for diet, health, exercise, sexuality, work, service to and support of Avatar Adi Da's Circumstance and Work, and cooperative (formal community) association (or at least significantly participatory affliation) with other practitioners of the Way of Adidam. The cultural obligations of the Way of Adidam include meditation, sacramental worship, study of Ruchira Avatar Adi Da's WisdomTeaching (and also at least a basic discriminative study of the Great Tradition of religion and Spirituality that is the Wisdom-inheritance of mankind), and regular participation in the "form" (or schedule) of daily, weekly, monthly, and annual devotional activities.
2. The entire Spiritual Process culminating in Divine Enlightenment has been exactly "mapped" by Avatar Adi Da, Who Describes It in terms of seven stages of life. In the total (or full and complete) practice of the Way of Adidam, the seven stages of life are, from first to last, a Process in Consciousness, Revealing (ultimately) that you are Consciousness, and not merely the body-mind.
The first three (or foundation) stages of life constitute the ordinary course of human adaptation—bodily, emotional, and mental growth. The fourth and fifth (or advanced) stages of life are characterized by the Awakening to Spirit, or the Spiritualizing of the body-mind.
In the sixth and seventh (or ultimate) stages of life Consciousness Itself is directly Realized, beyond identification with the body-mind. In the sixth stage of life, the Realizer Identifies with Consciousness (in profound states of meditation) by excluding all awareness of phenomena. Avatar Adi Da has Revealed that this was the highest form of Realization known in the religious and Spintual traditions previous to His Appearance. But this Realization is incomplete. Even the necessity to turn away from the world in order to fully Enjoy Consciousness represents a contraction, a refusal of Reality in its totality. The seventh stage of life (or the Realization of "Open Eyes"), which is Revealed and Given only by Avatar Adi Da, transcends this last limit. No exclusion is necessary, because the world is Realized to be a mere modification of Consciousness, not separate (or "different) from Consciousness at all.
The Da Love-Ananda Samrajya Pty Ltd.,
as trustee for The Da Love-Ananda Samrajya,
claims perpetual copyright to all photographs and
the entire Written (and otherwise recorded)
Wisdom-Teaching of Avatar Adi Da Samraj and
the Way of the Heart, or Adidam.
© 2006 The Da Love-Ananda Samrajya Pty Ltd.,
as trustee for The Da Love-Ananda Samrajya.
All rights reserved.
Used in DAbase by permission.
note to the reader
(Return to Politics)
(Return to Truth For Real)
(Return to Adidam Revelation Excerpts)
(Return to DAbase Main Page)